Gender and racial discrimination, surveillance, exploitation and so forth are only effects. The real problem is – that it is possible to suppress the people by false Science or false descriptions of the world – that supports Might Is Right. Or like this. We are not genuine citizens.

24 August 2016

Careful openings in the usually impregnable fog

Brexit has open the door to discuss what earlier was impossible to talk about in public. Hopefully, the present restricted opening is just the beginning.

Like for example Merkel's Chief of Staff on Brexit “Advice from Outside Out of Place”, Ralf Neukirch, René Pfister, Der Spiegel, 4 July 2016, ends with the following statement by Peter Altmaier that was unthinkable just some months earlier.
SPIEGEL: For European Commission President Jean-Claude Juncker and EU Parliament President Martin Schulz, the answer lies in more Europe. 
Altmaier: We have undergone paradoxical develop­ments in recent years: On the one hand, many in Europe are again placing value in their national identities. At the same time, globalization has led to a situation in which individual nation-states are less able to address current problems on their own. That's why we must act with prudence. Simply calling for more Europe is not enough.

Der Spiegel highlight also that the functions of the existing structures is far from the propaganda surface in Dieselgate in Europe: How Officials Ignored Years of Emissions Evidence, Markus Becker and Gerald Traufetter, Der Spiegel, 19 August 2016.

Read also: The death of neoliberalism and the crisis in western politics, Martin Jacques, The Guardian, 21 August 2016.
In the early 1980s the author was one of the first to herald the emerging dominance of neoliberalism in the west. Here he argues that this doctrine is now faltering. But what happens next?

At first I thought this article was not especially interesting as it was a collection of what is already known.

Then I slowly realized that it is in fact more or less revolutionary to make such relations public and that the stuff is published in the stuffy The Guardian that usually appear to be radical; but in fact always defend the present as their analysis never penetrate the layer of accepted political propaganda.

This article says openly that there is no official agenda. So, in a way The Guardian stays true to the ideal to promote the present political agenda;)

Don miss the many comments that highlight that the existing political perspective is dysfunctional. For example it is impossible to fit comments like this, made by Bilge, into the established perspective
Freedom to do what. ...keep working, keep buying the tat, keep paying the bills?
There is also a typical answer to my comment, to promote my stuff, that I answered.

And, remember the critique against so called Neoliberalism is not new.

Neoliberalism has brought out the worst in us, Paul Verhaeghe, The Guardian, 29 September 2014.

19 August 2016

Well, Well Interesting Times Ahead: Read About Putin's Anton Vaino

Nooscope mystery: The strange device of Putin's new man Anton Vaino, Olga Ivshina BBC Russian Service, 19 August 2019 .

Observe the diagram under the headline “Levers of Power” and the formulation “Concept of Truth”.

Anton Vaino

UPDATE 19 August 2016

The Weird Science and New Kremlin Chief of Staff, A bizarre article about “spacial scanners” and “registering the unseen” has been linked to the newly appointed top bureaucrat Anton Vaino, Daria Litvinova, The Moscow Times, 15 August 2016

And in the West the élite try to protect their Static myths and in fact warns for the internet even if they do not do it in the open read for example Does it matter if Google is rewiring our minds? Ask Plato, Steven Poole, The Guardian, 18 August 2016.

21 May 2016

Mathematics Is Not Restricted – It Is The Western Worldview That Is Restricted

(Stuff needed for upcoming chapters. Posted 5 June. I have faked the date to not put down the Slaughterkick movie – this info will be erased later)

Our history of Static horror is fascinating to follow in this splendid BBC Documentary, High Anxieties: The Mathematics of Chaos from 2008 written and produced by Mark Tanner and David Malone that also is the presenter.

Watch this perfect documentary that exposes the gap between what a few real scientists try to say and what you are trained to believe; that your world must be Static, in order to force you to obey. And they they fool you to believe that Science is the final evidence of that the world is Static.

Usually is information about mathematics either boring or super silly. Here you get an overview as well as interesting details.

Mathematics is just a tool and therefore there are no restrictions other than the user's perspective. Unfortunately, mathematics has so far mostly been used to justify the Static stupidity of the West by making mathematics mystical.

Dynamic relations cannot be understood in a Static perspective. Therefore there is a lot of hidden information in the works of some of the brightest mathematicians.

Or like this. What is called Chaos in a Static system is a total failure, but Chaos in a Dynamic system is only a beginning, change or a transformation; you have just to read about the god Chaos in the ancient Greek mythology to get that simple fact.

Three-body problem

Uses of the concept Chaos

Uses of the concept Tipping point

The concept the Butterfly effect

Probably almost in order of appearance

Henri Poincaré (1854–1912)

Aleksandr Lyapunov (1857–1918)

Paul Ormerod

June Barrow-Green

Peter Cox

David Ruelle

James Lovelock

See also: The Appearance of SUDDEN CHANGE in a Static Universe